The court, noting the absence of the applicant's counsel and lack of request for adjournment, dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution and discharged any issued notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 146 of 2015
Hari Shanker Lal
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| Virendra Chandra Srivastava | And 4 Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Brijesh Kumar Singh, Indrajeet Shukla, Umesh Chandra : Anil Kumar, Avneesh Kumar Shukla |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 8, 2025
Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
HARI SHANKER LAL
VIRENDRA CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA
MANISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
