Ramzan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9860 of 2025
Ramzan And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nitin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 15
HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
- Learned A.G.A prays for and is granted two weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
- A week's time thereafter is granted to learned counsel for the applicant for filing rejoinder affidavit, if any.
- List this case on 12.11.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ramzan & Another
Coram
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/9860/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Karunesh Singh Pawar
- Order 2 · Karunesh Singh Pawar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nankau Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko.
Ajay Kumar Mishra @ Atul Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another
Poonam @ Poonam Kapoor Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin.Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Sonu Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.