Manish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a bail application filed by Manish in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, allowing release on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions.
What did the court decide?
Release of applicant on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions prohibiting inducement of witnesses and requiring presence at trial.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71680
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7745 of 2025
Applicant :- Manish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dewendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Shri Dewendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.K.Rai, learned A.G.A.-Ist, and perused the record of the case.
The present bail application under 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed on behalf of applicant Manish with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 126 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station-Nai Mandi, District-Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of the trial.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. In gang-chart annexed as Annexure No. 2, three criminal cases has been mentioned in both of which the applicant is on bail. Criminal history of six cases has been explained in the the affidavit filed in support of bail application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in a gang case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manish
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/7745/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court