Husband sought bail in a case of his wife's death involving Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The dying declaration attributed the burning to co-accused Meera, not the applicant, who had no criminal history and had been in jail over nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70540
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4917 of 2025
Applicant :- Ravi Alias Prem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Zafar
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant-husband should be released on bail where the dying declaration implicates a co-accused and not him.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Alias Prem
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
