Shyamvarn Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
A bail application was adjourned at the request of the applicant's counsel and listed as fresh for a later date. The order decides nothing of substance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43957 of 2025
Shyamvarn Sharma
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajnish Kumar Pandey, Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the case is adjourned for the day.
Place this case as fresh on 16.12.2025.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
December 12, 2025
Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shyamvarn Sharma
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43957/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court