David Sindhu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned at counsel's request to explain the applicant's criminal history; listed as fresh for the week commencing 12.01.2026. No substantive decision on bail was made.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43539 of 2025
David Sindhu
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Preete Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
- On the request of Ms. Preete Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant, the case is adjourned for today to enable her to explain the criminal history of the applicant.
- Put up this case as fresh in the week commencing 12.01.2026 .
Parties & counsel
- applicant
David Sindhu
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43539/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court