Savej v. State of U.P.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43481 of 2025
Savej
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajiv Sisodia, Shashank Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the Staterespondent are present.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to explain criminal history of the applicant in compliance of sub-rule 7 of Rule 18 of Chapter XVIII of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 by means of affidavit.
- Put up as fresh on 18.12.2025.
(Santosh Rai,J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Savej
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Santosh Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43481/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court