Gaurav Kumar v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed; State counsel had not received instructions, so the matter was adjourned to a later date as fresh. No substantive decision was made on bail.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43359 of 2025
Gaurav Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hasan Parvej
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
- Learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions.
- Place this case as fresh on 7.1.2026.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
December 16, 2025
Manish Kr
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gaurav Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43359/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court