Disposed¶13

Danish v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Dec 2025BAIL/43076/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Danish vs State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43076 of 2025, Allahabad High Court, Court No. 70, Santosh Rai, J., order dated 05-12-2025. Direction to applicant's counsel Sandeep Kumar to explain criminal history by affidavit under sub-rule 7 of Rule 18, Chapter XVIII, Allahabad High Court Rules 1952; matter listed fresh on 19.12.2025. G.A. appeared for the State. No substantive ruling on bail; no precedents cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

Danish vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43076 of 2025

Danish

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 70

¶10

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State-respondent are present.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to explain criminal history of the applicant in compliance of sub-rule 7 of Rule 18 of Chapter XVIII of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 by means of affidavit.

¶13

Put up as fresh on 19.12.2025.

¶14

December 5, 2025 Asha

¶15

(Santosh Rai,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Danish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Danish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabir Ahmad vs State of Up and Another

Nitesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vipin Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Amarnath Gautam Alias Guddu vs State of U.P.

Radheshyam Chauhan vs State of U.P. and Another

Hari Ram Sahani vs State of U.P.