Smt. Anjali v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Observation order in bail application. No substantive decision or proposition established herein.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42927 of 2025
Smt. Anjali .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurav Srivastav, Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
- Learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions. 2. Place this case as fresh on 15.12.2025.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
December 4, 2025
Manish Kr
Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anjali
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/42927/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court