Second bail application under POCSO Act and BNS sections; rejected for want of new grounds despite prolonged incarceration. Trial court directed to expedite trial following Supreme Court guidance on speedy disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42109 of 2025
Raju
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Singh Rajbhar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
Court No. - 67
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
BAIL No. 42109 of 2025
2
bail to the applicant except the period of incarceration.
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
December 1, 2025
Vikas Verma
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, in jail over ten months with no new ground, should be released on bail under Sections 65(1), 99 BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vinod Kumar vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶9
Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 · Who else cites this
Hussain and Another vs. Union of IndiaRelied on¶9
Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raju
State of U.P.
3 Others
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
