Disposed¶19

Robin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Nov 2025BAIL/40330/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 40330 of 2025), Robin v. State of U.P., High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Krishan Pahal, J., order dated November 17, 2025. Interim directions calling upon the trial court to furnish a tabulated status report on the trial — date of framing of charge, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, adjournments with reasons, and result if trial concluded; two weeks' time to A.G.A. for counter affidavit; rejoinder within a week; matter listed 16.12.2025; copy of order to Trial Judge via District Judge by Registrar (Compliance). No statute or precedent discussed; no final decision on bail.

What did the court decide?

No final relief on bail; interim directions issued and the application adjourned — trial court to submit a status report, State granted time for counter affidavit, matter listed on 16.12.2025.

Robin vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No final relief on bail; interim directions issued and the application adjourned — trial court to submit a status report, State granted time for counter affidavit, matter listed on 16.12.2025.

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Robin is entitled to bail; consideration deferred pending a status report from the trial court on the progress of the trial.

¶2

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge is directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering (i) the date of framing of charge; (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses examined with dates; (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned, with reasons; and (v) if the trial stands concluded, the date of disposal and result.

¶2

Ratio / Principle

Two weeks' time is granted to the A.G.A. to file the counter affidavit; rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.) — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 40330 of 2025, Robin v. State of U.P., order dated November 17, 2025. Interim order in a pending bail application: the learned Trial Judge was directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, stating (i) the date on which the charge was framed; (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses examined before the trial court with dates; (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned, with reasons for adjournment; and (v) if the trial has been decided, the date of disposal and result. Two weeks' time was granted to the A.G.A. to file the counter affidavit, with rejoinder affidavit, if any, within a week thereafter. The matter was listed for 16.12.2025 in the daily cause list along with the report, and a copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40330 of 2025

Robin

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rajesh Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 67

¶10

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶11

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶12

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶13

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶14

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶15

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶16

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶17

(v) The trial court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶18

Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.

¶19

List on 16.12.2025 in the daily cause list alongwith the report.

¶20

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶21

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶22

November 17, 2025

¶23

(Ravi Kant)

¶24

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panna Vishwakarma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Happy vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shailesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Servesh Devi vs State of U.P.

Kishanveer vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rahees vs State of U.P.