Khurshid v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application of the applicant against the State of U.P.; learned AGA sought adjournment to obtain instructions and the matter was listed as fresh on 27.11.2025. No decision on bail was made.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40320 of 2025
Khurshid
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prateeyush Kumar Pathak, Rafat Raza Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 70
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the Staterespondent.
- Learned AGA seeks adjournment in order to obtain instructions in the matter.
- Put up as fresh on 27.11.2025.
November 17, 2025 RA
(Santosh Rai,J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Khurshid
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Santosh Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/40320/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ashutosh Srivastava
- Order 2 · Ashutosh Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court