Fareed Alam vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39425 of 2025

Fareed Alam

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Atul Srivastava, Mohd. Farooq
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 69

¶6

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 59 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 61(2), 191(2), 351(3), 3(5), 249 BNS, Police Station-Swaroop Nagar, District-Kanpur Nagar.

¶9

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated mainly on the basis of apprehension and doubt. The injured himself admitted in his statement that he could recognize only one co-accused Yusuf. It is further submitted that co-accused Sani Maurang has already been released by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32455 of 2025 vide order dated 10.11.2025. Therefore, he is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused. He further argued that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 06.07.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶10

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶11

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,

¶12

BAIL No. 39425 of 2025

¶13

2

¶14

submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused.

¶15

Let the applicant- Fareed Alam , involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶16

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶18

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶19

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶20

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶21

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶22

The applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶23

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶24

BAIL No. 39425 of 2025

¶25

3

¶26

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023; гeported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

November 18, 2025 Vandana

¶29

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Fareed Alam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fareed Alam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Yadav @ Bablu Yadav vs State of U.P.

Ankit Sharma vs State of U.P.

Sukuee and Another vs State of U.P.

Bobby vs State of U.P.

Rohit Nishad Alias Rohit Chaudhary vs State of U.P.

Sadik vs State of U.P.