Pawan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application allowed on grounds of parity with a co-accused who had been previously granted bail, subject to conditions ensuring non-tampering with evidence and witness intimidation.
What did the court decide?
Bail allowed on furnishing personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38535 of 2025
Pawan
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. | .... | .Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Ram Krishna Tripathi |
Dubey, Ravi | Shankar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 67
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
- List has been revised.
- Heard Ms. Kusum Lata, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ram Krishna Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
- Applicant seeks bail in Complaint No.534 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No.390 of 2014, under Sections 149, 120-B, 201 and 302 I.P.C., Police Station Barsana, District Mathura, during the pendency of trial.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on grounds of parity with a co-accused already granted bail?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pawan
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/38535/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court