Ajeet Singh vs State of U.P.

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.173 of 2025, under Sections 109, 318(3) BNS and Section 3/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi.

¶13

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that it is a case of police firing on police party in which no police personnel has received any injury. On the contrary the applicant has received firearm injury in the false encounter manipulated by the police. Applicant has explained the criminal history of two cases. The applicant is jail since 28.06.2025. He further submitted that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. In case the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶14

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶15

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Let the applicant- Ajeet Singh involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶17

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from

¶18

BAIL No. 38305 of 2025

¶19

2

¶20

disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶21

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶22

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶23

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶24

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶25

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶26

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶27

It is directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶28

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685

¶29

November 18, 2025 CS/-

¶30

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶31

Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajeet Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Yadav @ Bablu Yadav vs State of U.P.

Ankit Sharma vs State of U.P.

Sukuee and Another vs State of U.P.

Bobby vs State of U.P.

Rohit Nishad Alias Rohit Chaudhary vs State of U.P.

Sadik vs State of U.P.