The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a bail application by an accused charged with murder causing ante-mortem strangulation of the deceased in his house.
Bail application rejected; case directed to be decided expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38215 of 2025
Govind Gupta
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Singh, Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 67
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
BAIL No. 38215 of 2025
2
house of the applicant and the cause of death is asphyxia as a result of antemortem strangulation, as such, he is not entitled for bail.
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
November 18, 2025
(Ravi Kant)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving ante-mortem strangulation of the deceased.
Whether the case should be decided expeditiously in light of Supreme Court precedents.
Whether the observations in the bail application proceedings impact the merits of the case during trial.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vinod Kumar vs. State of PunjabReferred¶18
Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 · Who else cites this
Hussain and Another vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶18
Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702 · Who else cites this
Govind Gupta
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal
Parties & counsel
