Shiv Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Notice issued to respondent No. 2. Time granted for service and reply.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38167 of 2025
Shiv Kumar Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 65
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
आवेदक के िवद्वान अिधवक्ता एवं िवद्वान अपर शासकीय अिधवक्ता उपिस्थत हैं।
यह जमानत आवेदन पत्र पाक्सो एक्ट के अंतगर्त योिजत िकया गया है।
िवपक्षी सं० 2 को नोिटस िनगर्त की जाय। आवेदक की ओर से नोिटस भेजने के संबंध में आवश्यक पैरवी एक सप्ताह के अन्दर की जाय।
तद्नुसार, इस वाद को िद० 16.12.2025 को नवीन वाद के रूप में सूचीबद्ध िकया जाय।
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shiv Kumar Yadav
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/38167/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sameer Jain
- Order 2 · Sameer Jain
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court