Constable Dharmendra Yadav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for hearing; State counsel sought one week to obtain instructions, which was granted, and the matter was directed to be listed afresh.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37829 of 2025
Constable Dharmendra Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State of U.P. | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Somendra Singh, Uday Prakash |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 73
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
- Sri Ajeet Shukla, learned Advocate, holding brief of Sri Uday Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur, learned AGA, for the State, are present.
- At the very outset learned AGA submits that till date he could not receive the instruction in the matter. He prays for and is granted one week time to seek instruction in the matter.
- In view of the above, put up this case again as fresh on 11.11.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Constable Dharmendra Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Sameer Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/37829/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court