Mohd. Jubair v. State of U.P.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36566 of 2025
Mohd. Jubair
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gagan Pratap Singh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
- It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed any offence. Alleged offences are not made out against the applicant. The allegations made in the FIR are false. It is further submitted that co-accused Naved has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 33692 of 2025 by order dated 6.10.2025. Claiming parity, pleading false implication it is lastly contended that the accused applicant is languishing in jail since 30.08.2025 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Jubair
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/36566/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court