Harinandan Alias Hinna v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application for the applicant; supplementary affidavit taken on record and three weeks' time granted to the State to file a counter affidavit, with one week thereafter for rejoinder. Case listed for 04.12.2025 in top ten cases.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36149 of 2025
Harinandan Alias Hinna
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Bind Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record.
Learned A.G.A. prayed for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
One week thereafter is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Harinandan Alias Hinna
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/36149/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court