Allowed

Gufran Alias Pappu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Oct 2025BAIL/34770/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS for release in an Arms Act case involving alleged recovery of a Tamancha and hammer. Court considered nature of accusations, evidence and antecedents, and allowed bail subject to conditions including no tampering with evidence and regular trial appearance.

What did the court decide?

Accused-applicant to be released on bail on personal bond and two reliable sureties, subject to stated conditions.

Gufran Alias Pappu vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34770 of 2025

¶3

Gufran Alias Pappu

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Javed Alam, Mohd.	Azam
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 68

¶7

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶8

Supplementary affidavit is taken on record.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶10

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Gufran Alias Pappu , seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 285 of 2025, under Sections 5/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffar Nagar, during the pendency of the trial before the Court below.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 6.7.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that false recovery of one Tamancha and one hammer have been shown from the possession of the applicant. He has four cases criminal antecedent, which have sufficiently been explained and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶12

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶13

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made

¶14

BAIL No. 34770 of 2025

¶15

¶16

out.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶18

Let the accused-applicant, Gufran Alias Pappu , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶19

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶20

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶21

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶22

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶23

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶24

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶25

October 30, 2025

¶26

Ravi Prakash

¶27

Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gufran Alias Pappu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gufran Alias Pappu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nadeem vs State of U.P.

Ravi Singh vs State of U.P.

Chand vs State of U.P.

Aakash Kumar Bharti vs State of U.P.

Munna vs State of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary (Home)

Pramod Sonkar vs State of U.P.