Disposed¶11

Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC2 Sept 2025BAIL/30138/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30138 of 2025, Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. and 3 others, Samit Gopal J., order dated September 2, 2025; procedural/interim order: notice accepted by State counsel (G.A./Bade Lal Bind) for Opposite Party No. 1, service on Opposite Party No. 2 via High Court Legal Services Committee, notice to Opposite Party Nos. 3 and 4 returnable within four weeks, matter listed 03.11.2025; applicant's counsel Lakshman Tripathi and Suryansh Pandey; no merits determination, no citations.

What did the court decide?

None; interim procedural directions only — notice to opposite party nos. 3 and 4 returnable within four weeks (steps within a week); matter listed on 03.11.2025. Bail application not decided on merits. ¶11

Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30138 of 2025

¶2

Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Lakshman Tripathi, Suryansh Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 64

¶6

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶7

List revised.

¶8

Heard Sri Lakshman Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State.

¶9

Notice on behalf of the State of U.P./Opposite Party No. 1 has been accepted by the learned State counsel and on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 has been served in the office of the High Court Legal Services Committee.

¶10