Pradeep v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for revision; applicant's counsel sought a month's time to file a supplementary affidavit, which was granted, and the matter was directed to be relisted on 11.11.2025. No substantive ruling was made.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29760 of 2025
Pradeep
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
- List revised.
- Sri Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for State are present.
- Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted a month's time to file supplementary affidavit in the matter.
- Let the matter be listed on 11.11.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pradeep
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29760/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court