Rahul Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for revision; State granted two weeks to file counter affidavit, with rejoinder due a week thereafter. Matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26656 of 2025
Rahul Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Prakash Pandey, Saurabh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 67
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
- List has been revised.
- Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
- List on 15.10.2025 in the daily cause list.
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
September 16, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/26656/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
- Order 2 · Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court