Allowed

Vansal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2025BAIL/22562/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to an applicant charged with offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 352, and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents regarding offences punishable up to seven years and imposed standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding tampering with evidence and attending trial.

Vansal vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114032

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22562 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Vansal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Satsangi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Pankaj Satsangi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 131 of 2025, under Section- 110, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police StationRajpura, District-Sambhal, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It has been further submitted that all the offence are punishable upto 7 years. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 29.05.2025 having no criminal history. Charge sheet has already been submitted, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶10

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as well as law laid down by the Apex Court regarding offences punishable upto 7 years in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 and Siddharth vs State of U.P. and another; (2022) 1 SCC 676 and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶11

Let the applicant- Vansal involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶12

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶17

Order Date :- 15.7.2025 PS

¶18

Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vansal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vansal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Boudh Saran Alias Buddha vs State of U.P.

Shahrukh vs State of U.P.

Smt. Jyoti Sagar vs State of U.P.

Hariom Alias Bhura vs State of U.P.

Tinku Bhargav @ Yatendra vs State of U.P.

Devendra and Another vs State of U.P.