Sajan Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103399

Court No. - 64

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22051 of 2025

Applicant :- Sajan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jagdev Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶6

List revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jagdev Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

¶8

This bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant Sajan, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 61 of 2025, under Sections 69, 89, 351(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Shivala Kalan, District Bijnor.

¶9

The FIR of the matter was lodged on 02.05.2025 by the victim against the applicant and Deepa alleging therein that she is working in a private company in Haridwar where the applicant is also working. Both of them developed intimacy and on a false promise to marry the applicant established physical relationship with her wherein she became pregnant but the said pregnancy was aborted by saying that they will have child after marriage. She many times asked him to marry but he refused. Report be lodged and action be taken.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the victim is a major woman aged about 23 years. It is submitted that the relationship between the applicant and the victim was a consensual relationship as both of them are working together and they are in love with each other. It is submitted that some discussion with regard to marriage between them but did not materialize thus the present FIR has been lodged. It is submitted that the applicant has no criminal history as stated in para 19 of the

¶11

affidavit and is in jail since 19.05.2025.

¶12

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶13

After having heard learned counsels for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that the victim is a major aged about 23 years. Some discussion with regard to marriage between them but could not materialize and the FIR has been lodged.

¶14

Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let the applicant Sajan , be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶16

i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶17

ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶18

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶19

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 84 BNSS, 2023 may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 209 BNS, 2023.

¶20

(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS,

¶21

If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 BNS, 2023.

¶22

(vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant.

¶23

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶24