Second bail application under Sections 376 IPC, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act and Section 67 IT Act. Counsel did not press the application, seeking to file a fresh one after recording witness statements; the court dismissed it at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24890
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2114 of 2023
Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Gautam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Manju Gupta,Kaushal Kishore Tewari,Surya Prakash
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 30.4.2025/-Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the applicant be released on bail in a POCSO/IPC 376/IT Act case?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shravan Kumar Gautam
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
