Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrett. U.P. Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail application dismissed as infructuous because applicant was convicted by trial court on 3.2.2023 while bail application pending; applicant absent at hearing, decision taken on AGA's written instructions; Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 1612 of 2023; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; decided 15.09.2025.
What did the court decide?
In view of the learned AGA's statement (based on written instructions) that the applicant had been convicted by the trial court on 3.2.2023, the bail application had become infructuous and was dismissed as infructuous. ¶13