Mahesh Kapoor v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12540 of 2025
Mahesh Kapoor
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 15
HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
Vakalatnama filed by Shri Anand Pratap Singh, Advocate, on behalf of the complainant is taken on record. His name shall be printed in the cause list as counsel for the complainant when the case is next listed.
Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file a counter affidavit, and one week thereafter to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahesh Kapoor
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home
Coram
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/12540/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajeev Bharti
- Order 2 · Rajeev Bharti
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dharmesh Kumar @ Dharmesh and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home and Another
Brahmdev Dangi vs Union of India Thru. Narcotic Control Bureau (Ncb) Lko.
Nadeem @ Firoz @ Jeetu @ Kamran Ali Khan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.
Amir Ahmad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.