Allowed¶16

Nabi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

Allahabad HC27 Nov 2025BAIL/11634/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nabi Hasan bail application allowed; FIR No. 310 of 2025; Section 69 BNS; P.S. Chapiya, District Gonda; alleged false pretext of marriage over 8 months; victim tentative age 20 years; custody since 31.08.2025; no criminal antecedents; personal bond plus two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each with bail conditions; Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, J.; November 27, 2025; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11634 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant Nabi Hasan on bail in FIR No. 310 of 2025 upon furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to the stated conditions. ¶16

Nabi Hasan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Release of applicant Nabi Hasan on bail in FIR No. 310 of 2025 upon furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, subject to the stated conditions.

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether applicant Nabi Hasan, held in FIR No. 310 of 2025 (Section 69, BNS), Police Station Chapiya, District Gonda, is entitled to release on bail.

¶12

Court's answer

The applicant is entitled to be released on bail, having regard to the age of the victim (tentatively 20 years), the relationship lasting over 8 months, the applicant having no criminal antecedents, and his being in custody since 31.08.2025.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

Bail is granted conditional upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with conditions that the applicant attend hearings, commit no similar offence, and make no inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts so as to dissuade disclosure or tamper with evidence.

¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

BAIL ALLOWED — High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow), Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, J.; decision dated November 27, 2025, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11634 of 2025 (Nabi Hasan v. State of U.P.). Applicant detained in FIR No. 310 of 2025, Police Station Chapiya, District Gonda, under Section 69 of BNS, on the FIR allegation that wrong was committed on the false pretext of marriage over the last 8 months and the victim became pregnant; tentative age of victim stated as 20 years; applicant in jail since 31.08.2025 with no criminal antecedents. Considering the victim's age, the 8-month duration of the relationship, absence of criminal antecedents and the period of custody, the Court held the applicant entitled to bail and allowed the application: release ordered on furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, with conditions to attend hearings, refrain from committing similar offences, and refrain from any inducement, threat or promise to persons acquainted with the facts or tampering with evidence.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11634 of 2025

Nabi Hasan

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Shashikant Verma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 12

¶10

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

¶11

1. Heard Miss. Kabya, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶12

2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.310 of 2025, under Section 69 of BNS, Police Station Chapiya, District Gonda.

¶13

3 . In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on the false pretext of marriage for the last 8 months wrong was committed and the victim became pregnant. The tentative age of the victim is 20 years.

¶14

4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶15

5. Considering the age of the victim; the fact that the relationship lasted over 8 months and that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 31.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶16

6. Let the applicant Nabi Hasan be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶17

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶18

BAIL No. 11634 of 2025

¶19

¶20

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶21

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶22

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)

¶23

November 27, 2025

¶24

akverma

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nabi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nabi Hasan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Buddhilal Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Lko.

Gulsan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vivek Bajpai vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy. Home Lko.

Sanjay Kumar @ Dabloo vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Ratipal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Sapna Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.