Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case under Sections 386, 506 IPC and Section 67 IT Act was not pressed on merit; the court refused the relief but directed expeditious decision of the regular bail application upon surrender within two weeks, with no coercive action in the interim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:997
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11201 of 2024 Applicant :- Syed Atif Maqbool Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ambreen Masroor,Irfan Ahmad,Qazi Abid Azam,Sadrul Islam Jafri,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.
Order Date :- 3.1.2025 sailesh
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶6
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Syed Atif Maqbool
State of U.P.
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
