Application under Section 483 CrPC seeking expedition of trial under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Court found the complainant herself had not led evidence despite opportunities and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4207
Court No. - 82
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 2274 of 2024
Applicant :- Rijwana Bano Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Asha
Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant was entitled to a direction to the trial court to expedite her complaint case when she had not adduced any evidence herself.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Rijwana Bano
State of U.P.
Zakir Husain @ Munna and others
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
