Complainant in a pending cheque dishonour case sought a direction for expeditious disposal. The High Court observed that the Act itself prescribes a stipulated period and the trial court must comply absent legal impediment; the application was disposed of with these observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:95501
Court No. - 53
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1678 of 2024
Applicant :- Rakesh Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 5.6.2025 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to decide the pending Section 138 NI Act complaint expeditiously within a stipulated period.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Singh
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
