Disposed

Meraj Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC10 Nov 2025A482/9425/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a cognizance order and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties. The court directed verification of the compromise by the trial court within three weeks, stayed coercive measures until then, and listed the matter after four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection from coercive measures; parties permitted to seek verification of compromise before the trial court; original compromise deed returned to counsel.

Meraj Ali and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9425 of 2025

¶3

Meraj Ali And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Pankaj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 23

¶10

HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

¶11

Ms. Vijay Laxmi Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶13

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the cognizance order dated 20.12.2016, arising out of Case Crime No.0238 of 2016, Criminal Case No.7822 of 2016, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Wazir Ganj, District- Gonda (State Vs. Meraj Ali & others), passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ F.T.C./ Addl. C.J.M., District- Gonda as well as impugned charge sheet dated 19.07.2016 submitted by the Investigating Officer against the applicants on the basis of compromise.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them which has been reduced in writing. Copy of which is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the instant application.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the aforesaid facts.

¶16

A482 No. 9425 of 2025

¶17

¶18

Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed and be permitted to file an application for verification of the original compromise document. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for verification of the compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order with respect to the verification within a period of three weeks from today. Upon due verification, the court below may pass appropriate order in that regard and send a report to this Court.

¶19

List after four weeks.

¶20

Till then no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants.

¶21

Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶22

November 10, 2025

¶23

Anand/-

¶24

(Rajeev Bharti,J.)

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Meraj Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meraj Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mithilesh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Shivam Kori Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Sanjay Kumar Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Akhilesh Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Kuldeep Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Ajeet Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another