The court quashed criminal proceedings arising from a complaint case due to an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on Supreme Court precedents permitting quashing in such circumstances.
Quashing of complaint case no. 0001877 of 2015 and non-bailable warrant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7065 of 2016
Onkar Nath Nigam
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. And Anr. | .....Opposite Pa |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Prashant Kumar Singh, Amit Singh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : Govt. Advocate, Nilish Anand |
.....Opposite Party(s)
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
"to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 0001877 of 2015 (Rajendra Jaiswal Vs. Onkar Nath and another) under Section 386 IPC, Police Station Hussainganj, District Lucknow pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Lucknow as well as non-bailable warrant dated 12.5.2016 passed by the court concerned."
"ससम्मान अवगत कराना है िक माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश िदनांिकत 23.05.2024 के अनुक्रम में उभयपक्ष द्वारा प्रस्तुत सुलहनामा, पक्षकारों की व्यिक्तगत उपिस्थित सुिनिश्चत करते हुए, पक्षकारों की पहचान सुिनिश्चत कर, पक्षकारों की उपिस्थित में पूवर् पीठासीन अिधकारी द्वारा सत्यािपत िकया गया तथा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के अनुक्रम में इस आशय की िरपोटर् तैयार की गयी। अधोहस्ताक्षरी द्वारा न्यायालय अपर मुख्य न्याियक मिजस्ट्रेट प्रथम, कक्ष संख्या-25, लखनऊ का कायर्भार माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के नोिटिफकेशन नंवर-1682/Admin (Services) / 2024, िदनांिकत : 21.06.2024 के अनुकम में िदनांक 26.06.2024 को ग्रहण िकया गया। पूवर् पीठासीन अिधकारी द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश िदनांिकत 23.05.2024 के अनुक्रम में पक्षकारों द्वारा दािखल सुलहनामे को तस्दीक करने के उपरांत तैयार की गयी िरपोटर् िदनांिकत 06.06.2024 की सत्यािपत प्रित पत्र के साथ संलग्न कर माननीय महोदय को सादर अवलोकनाथर् प्रेिषत की जा रही है।
अतः माननीय महोदय से िनवेदन है िक सत्यापन आदेश की प्रित माननीय न्यायालय के समक्ष आवश्यक कायर्वाही हेतु प्रस्तुत करने की कृपा करें।"
A482 No. 7065 of 2016
2
submission made by learned counsel for petitioner or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid are quashed.
September 3, 2025 Virendra
(Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed in light of an amicable compromise between the parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Narinder Singh v. State of PunjabRelied on¶21
Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466 · Who else cites this
Yogendra Yadav v. State of JharkhandRelied on¶21
Yogendra Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand (2014) 9 SCC 653 · Who else cites this
Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of GujaratRelied on¶21
Parbatbhai Aahir Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Onkar Nath Nigam
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Jaiswal
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
