Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the applicants to press the petition; any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6832 of 2018
Amarnath And Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition.
Shri Hansraj Verma, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of respondent State is present.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
November 7, 2025
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Amarnath And Others
State of U.P.
Another
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
