A single judge order dismissing an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS, 2023 for want of prosecution as the applicant counsel was not present.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4713 of 2017
Kshetriya Sri Gandhi Ashram Thru. Secy./Admin.Officer And Anr.
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Labour Deptt. Civil Sectt.And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Nath Tripathi, Jai Prakash Katiyar, Manoj Kumar Sahu, Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
September 16, 2025
Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kshetriya Sri Gandhi Ashram Thru. Secy./Admin.Officer And Anr.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
