Dismissed¶15

Surendra Kumar Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Allahabad HC25 Nov 2025A482/4350/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution of an application under Section 482 (No. 4350 of 2019), Surendra Kumar Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Anr., High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, decided by Rajeev Bharti, J. on November 25, 2025. Grounds: non-appearance of the applicant and office report dated 18.8.2025 showing no deposit in compliance of order dated 10.6.2019. Interim order, if any, stood vacated. Learned A.G.A. present for the opposite parties; no merits adjudication; no cases or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, none having appeared for the applicant when the list was revised. ¶15

Surendra Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and Anr. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4350 of 2019

¶3

Surendra Kumar Tiwari

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And Anr.

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Dhirendra Pratap Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 23

¶10

HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

¶11

List revised.

¶12

From perusal of the office report dated 18.8.2025, it transpires that no amount has been deposited in compliance of order dated 10.6.2019, as per record available on cash section.

¶13

None appears on behalf of the applicant.

¶14

Learned A.G.A. is present.

¶15

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶16

Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

¶17

(Rajeev Bharti,J.)

¶18

November 25, 2025