Dhappi Yadav v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC could not be heard due to paucity of time; the court listed it after two weeks and extended any interim order till the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36386 of 2024
Applicant :- Dhappi Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Due to paucity of time, the case could not be heard.
List this case after two weeks.
Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date of listing. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Kalp Nath Singh
Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dhappi Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
- other
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/36386/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court