Vijay Goyal Alias Banti and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
A Section 482 application by two applicants claiming false implication was adjourned at counsel's request so that three related cases could be heard together on a single date.
What the court decided
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3575 of 2025
Applicant :- Vijay Goyal Alias Banti And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pandey,Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated by the police in three cases, which are likely to be listed in the next week, therefore, this matter may be passed over for the day, so that all the maters may be heard and decided on a single date.
- Put up as fresh on 25.2.2025.
Order Date :- 5.2.2025 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay Goyal Alias Banti And Another
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/3575/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court