This is a one-paragraph order by a Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing an Application under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous due to efflux of time, noting the absence of the applicant and lack of interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3417 of 2019
Madhav Ram And Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Bal Krishna Shukla
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
From perusal of the record, in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating.
It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
November 18, 2025
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Madhav Ram And Others
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
