Yogesh Kumar Rajpoot v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Rajeev Misra, J.); Application U/S 482 No. 31016 of 2024, decided 3.1.2025; Section 482 Cr.P.C. application by accused Yogesh Kumar Rajpoot dismissed; no interference with order dated 29.06.2024 of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Mainpuri rejecting recall of prosecution witnesses P.W.-1 Vinod Kumar and P.W.-2 Payal @ Shivani in Sessions Trial No. 611 of 2013 (State Vs. Yogesh) under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, District Mainpuri; trial court's reasons in paragraph 5 held just and legal; counsel: Shravan Kumari for applicant, G.A. for opposite party.
What did the court decide?
The Court accepted the learned A.G.A.'s preliminary objection that the reasons/findings recorded by the court below in paragraph 5 of the impugned order are prima facie just and legal, and found that those objections were borne out from the record and could not be dislodged by the applicant's counsel with reference to the record.