Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of a summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act complaint. The applicant claimed the cheque was a security cheque and payment was made. The court held these were trial defenses, found no illegality, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4856
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30987 of 2024
Applicant :- Subhash Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dwarika Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Jitendra
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act should be quashed on the plea that the cheque was a security cheque and the amount was already paid.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Subhash Kumar Pandey
State of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Pandey
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
