Allowed

Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2025A482/3056/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of gangster proceedings where the gang chart was prepared before charge sheets were filed in the constituent cases; one case ended in acquittal. Application allowed; proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order quashed.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings of Session Case No. 255 of 2021, charge sheet in Case Crime No. 156 of 2020 under Section 3(1) Gangsters Act, and summoning order dated 24.11.2021 quashed; liberty for fresh decision.

Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3056 of 2023

¶3

Arif Anwar Hashmi And Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. Another	And .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manoj Kumar Misra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 13

¶8

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶9

Supplementary counter affidavit dated 18.11.2025 sworned by Sri Raghvendra Singh, Circle Officer, P.S.-Sadullah Nagar, District-Balrampur, filed today is taken on record.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri S.P.Tiwari alongwith Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶11

Instant application has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceedings of Session Case No. 255 of 2021 (State vs. Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others) pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Rape and POCSO Act)-II, Balrampur and also charge sheet arising out of Case Crime No. 156 of 2020 under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster's Act, P.S.-Sadullah Nagar, Balrampur, including summoning order dated 24.11.2021.

¶12

The prayer aforesaid has been sought on the following fact(s)/reason(s):-

¶13

(i) According to the settled proposition of law, the gang chart should be prepared based upon the case(s) in which charge sheet has already submitted before the Court concerned.

¶14

(ii) In the instant case gang chart was prepared and forwarded on 04.11.2020 and thereafter again forwarded on 05.11.2020 and subsequently approved by the District Magistrate on 06.11.2020. The gang chart was prepared based upon following case(s):-

¶15

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶16

¶17

(a) Case Crime No. 91 of 2019 under Sections 504, 506, 353 IPC and Section 3(1)Dha SC/ST Act and 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S.-Sadullah Nagar, District-Balrampur.

¶18

(b) Case Crime No. 98 of 2020 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 447 IPC and 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S.Sadullah Nagar, District-Balrampur.

¶19

¶20

(d) Case Crime No. 164 of 2019 under Sections 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S.-Sadullah Nagar, DistrictBalrampur.

¶21

(iii) The charge sheet was not filed before the Court concerned in Case Crime No(s). 98 of 2020, 114 of 2020 and 164 of 2019 at the time of preparation and forwarding i.e. on 04.11.2020 and 05.11.2020, respectively, as also approving i.e. on 06.11.2020 the gang chart.

¶22

(iv) Indisputably, the judgment of acquittal has been passed on 30.04.2025 in Case Crime No. 91 of 2019, which is evident from para 3 of the supplementary counter affidavit dated 18.11.2025 filed by the State.

¶23

(v) In Case Crime No. 98 of 2020, the charge sheet was submitted by the Police officer before the Court concerned on 07.12.2020, which is apparent from para 4 of the Supplementary Counter Affidavit dated 18.11.2025 filed by the State.

¶24

(vi) In Case Crime No. 114 of 2020, the charge sheet was submitted by the Police officer before the Court concerned on 12.11.2020, which is evident from para 5 of the Supplementary Counter Affidavit filed by the State.

¶25

(vii) In Case Crime No. 164 of 2019, the charge sheet was submitted by the Police officer before the Court concerned on 06.03.2021, which is apparent from para 6 of the Supplementary Counter Affidavit dated 18.11.2025 filed by the State.

¶26

It is stated that the proceedings in issue based upon which gang chart was prepared on 04.11.2020 and approved on 06.11.2020 is abuse of process of law in view of the Circular dated 24.10.2003 issued from the Office of

¶27

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶28

¶29

Director General of Police, U.P. as also Government Order dated 02.01.2004 and the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Misc. Bench No. 22007 of 2020 (Master @ Ramzan And Anr. vs. State of U.P. And Ors.) decided on 09.12.2020, where relevant circular and Government Order were considered and subsequently followed by this Court in other cases, including Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 7428 of 2022 (Sanjay Kumar Mall vs. State of U.P. And Others) decided on 04.12.2022 and Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 8164 of 2022 (Ankit Sharma @ Ankit Kumar vs. State of U.P. And 3 Others) decided on 09.11.2022.

¶30

Without referring to relevant para(s) of all the judgment(s), referred above, it would be apt to refer relevant para(s) of the judgment passed in the case of Ankit Sharma @ Ankit Kumar (supra):-

¶31

"4. On 04.11.2022, this Court passed the following order:-

¶32

"Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has filed vakalatnama, the same is taken on record and Sri Badruddin Hasan, learned A.G.A. has appeared on behalf of State.

¶33

Sri Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner has preferred Rule 5(c) of The Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 to submit that without filing the charge-sheet in the particular case crime the gangster act may not be imposed. In the present case, without there being filed any charge-sheet, the gangster act has been imposed against the petitioner. He has also placed reliance of the judgment and order dated 9.12.2020 passed by this Court, wherein the similar controversy has been considered and the said writ petition was allowed on the basis of the same submissions so raised by Sri Dwivedi in the present case.

¶34

Learned A.G.A. has drawn attention of this Court towards annexure no.2, which is gangchart, wherein it has been indicated that the charge-sheet no.345/2022 dated 9.9.2022 has been filed before the learned court below. He has also submitted that in the first information report, the same fact has been indicated. However, Sri Dwivedi has again submitted that no such charge-sheet has yet been filed before the learned court below, may be the same has been prepared.

¶35

Put up this case as fresh on 9.11.2022 to enable the learned A.G.A. to seek specific instructions as to whether the charge-sheet has been filed in Case Crime No.123 of 2021, under Sections 41/411, 419, 420 I.P.C., P.S. Pargana Kheri.

¶36

When the case is listed next, the name of Sri Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi and Ms. Nida Nabi be shown as counsel for the petitioner."

¶37

5. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court

¶38

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶39

¶40

towards annexure no.5 of the affidavit filed today which is a certified copy of the questionnaire dated 04.11.2022 issued by the learned court below wherein it has been categorically mentioned that by 04.11.2022 no charge-sheet has been filed in Case Crime No.123 of 2021, under Section 41, 411, 413, 419, 420 I.P.C. Police Station-Pasgawan, District-Kheri. Therefore, it is clear that till filing of the gang-chart (annexure no.2 to the writ petition), no charge-sheet was filed against the petitioner in Case Crime No.123 of 2021. However, in the gang-chart, the impression has been given as if the charge-sheet has been filed on 21.08.2021. Therefore, for seeking specific instructions, the matter was fixed for today.

¶41

6. Learned A.G.A. has filed instruction today and the same is taken on record.

¶42

7. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions has stated that the charge-sheet has been filed on 05.11.2022 before the learned court below.

¶43

8. On being confronted the learned A.G.A. about the aforesaid situation, he has fairly stated that in the gang-chart it should have been categorically indicated that however, charge-sheet has been prepared but the same has not been filed.

¶44

9. On being further confronted that the date of charge-sheet has been indicated as 21.08.2021, however, no such charge-sheet has been filed on or before 04.11.2022, on that learned A.G.A. has submitted that aforesaid documents is on record, therefore, he has nothing to say.

¶45

10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶46

11. For convenience, Rule 5(C), Rule 10 and Rule 8 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 2021'), which have been indicated in the affidavit, are being reproduced herein-below:-

¶47

"Rule-5(C)- The gang-chart shall not mention those cases in which acquittal has been granted by the Special Court or in which the final report has been filed after the investigation. However, the gang-chart shall not be approved without the completion of investigation of the base case.

¶48

Rule-10- Records of Base Cases.-(1) Along with gang chart, the certified copy of the charge sheet and recovery memo shall be attached compulsorily.

¶49

(2) Where the accused is not named in the First Information Report and document discloses the way in which his name came to light and if something has been recovered, a certified copy of the recovery memo shall be attached.

¶50

Rule 8- Stating unconfirmed or false information is prohibited.-(1) The Incharge of Police Station/Station House Officer/Inspector shall not mention the cases as Part Trial or Partial Trial (PT) without ascertaining the up-to-date status of the cases in the gang-chart.

¶51

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶52

¶53

(2) No unconfirmed or false information shall be entered in the gang-chart.

¶54

(3) The latest status of the cases against the gang, which are being shown in the gangchart, regarding their pendency in the Special Court, the convictions or the stage at which they are in the Court, must be clearly mentioned

¶55

(4) The responsibility of recording the correct and true information shall lie on the concerned Incharge of Station/ Station House Officer/Inspector

¶56

(5) On discovering an adverse situation, the Incharge of Police Station/Station House Officer/Inspector shall be held liable for negligence under departmental and criminal proceedings."

¶57

12. In light of aforesaid facts and circumstances and also from the perusal of the aforesaid provisions of law i.e. Rule 5(C), Rule-10 and Rule-8 of Rules of 2021, it is clear that before making compliance of Rule 10 of Rules of 2021, the gang-chart has been filed. Even the wrong impression has been given to the Court that the charge-sheet has been filed in the Case Crime No.123 of 2021. Therefore, in such circumstances, required action under Rule-8(5) would be warranted which clearly mentions that on discovering an adverse situation, the Incharge of Police Station/Station House Officer/Inspector shall be held liable for negligence under departmental and criminal proceedings.

¶58

13. Not only above, in an identical circumstances, this Court vide judgment and order dated 09.12.2020 passed in Writ Petition No.22007 (M/B) of 2020; 'Master @ Ramzan and Anr. Vs. State of U.P. and Ors' has allowed the writ petition quashing the F.I.R. in question. For convenience, the judgment and order dated 09.12.2020 passed in the aforesaid case in being reproduced herein below:-

¶59

1. Heard Asim Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Shachindra Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the respondent State.

¶60

2. The writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned F.I.R. No.0430 of 2020 dated 13.10.2020, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (for short 'Gangsters Act') registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda.

¶61

3. The petitioners have also prayed for quashing of the Gang Chart prepared under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda and commanding the opposite parties to drop the proceedings under Section 3(1) of Gangsters Act registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda, with all consequential reliefs.

¶62

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged in a most arbitrary and illegal manner without proper application of mind.

¶63

5. It is also submitted that in the gang chart, three criminal cases have been shown against

¶64

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶65

¶66

petitioner no.2. In case bearing Case Crime No.156/2019, he has been granted bail whereas so far Case Crime No.312 of 2019 and Case Crime No.406 of 2020 are concerned, the police has not yet filed any chargesheet in the concerning court.

¶67

6. Similarly, in the gang chart, two criminal cases have been shown against petitioner no.1. In one case bearing Case Crime No.156/2019, he has been granted bail whereas in other case, chargesheet has not been filed by the police as yet.

¶68

However, on the basis of the wrong information furnished in the gang chart, the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioners.

¶69

7. It is stated that as per the Government Order dated 2.1.2004 as well as Circular issued by the Director General of Police dated 24.10.2003, only those criminal cases in which chargesheets have been filed, shall be taken into consideration for the purpose of invoking Gangsters Act, 1986.

¶70

8. Learned A.G.A. was granted time to seek instructions. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of the instructions, has filed short counter affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶71

9. In paragraphs 5,6 and 7 of the short counter affidavit, it has been stated that the police after completing investigation, had filed the chargesheet in Case Crime No.156 of 2019 before lodging of impugned F.I.R., however in Case Crime No.312 of 2019, the chargesheet has been prepared by the police and has been submitted in the concerning court on 4.12.2020. Similarly, in Case Crime No.406 of 2020, the police has prepared the chargesheet which has been submitted before the court concerned on 4.12.2020. The relevant paragraphs are reproduced as under :-

¶72

"5. That it is relevant to mention here that after completion of investigation in Case Crime No.156 of 2019 registered at Police - Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda under Sections 323, 504, 307 and 302 IPC, 7 CLA Act, charge sheet dated 31.05.2019 was forwarded and received by the concerned Court on 12.06.2019.

¶73

6. That in Case crime No.312 of 2019, registered at Police Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda, under Sections 504, 506 IPc, chargesheet dated 30.11.2020 was forwarded and received by the concerned court on 04.12.20202. Phototstat copy of the receipt dated 04.12.2020 is being filed herewith as Annexure No.SCA-1 to this Short Counter Affidavit.

¶74

7. That in Case Crime No.406/2020, registered at Police - Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda, under Sections 352, 504 and 506 IPC, charge sheet dated 29.09.2020 was forwarded and received by the concerned Court on 04.12.2020. Photostat copy of the receipt dated 04.12.20202 is being annexed as Annexure No.SCA-2to this Short Counter Affidavit."

¶75

10. As such, it is evidently clear that in Case Crime No.312 of 2019 as well as Case Crime No.406 of 2020, the chargesheets against the petitioners have been filed in the court after lodging of the impugned F.I.R. under Section 3(1) of the Gangsters Act, 1986.

¶76

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶77

¶78

11. It is to be noted that the Government Order dated 2.1.2004 specifically provides that only those criminal cases shall be included in the gang chart in which the police has prepared the chargesheet and the same has been filed before the court concerned.

¶79

12. It has also been mentioned in the said Government Order that in case of any misuse by the authorities, the concerning incharge of the police station as well as Senior Superintendent of Police/ Superintendent of Police Incharge of the concerned Districts shall be held responsible.

¶80

13. Paragraphs 5 and 10 of the Government Order dated 2.1.2004 are relevant. Paragraphs 5 and 10 of the Government Order dated 2.1.2004 are reproduced :-

¶81

"5. िकसी भी िगरोह के िव�� काय�वाही करने के िलए, उसके िव�� केवल उ�ह� मामल� को आपरािधक सूची म� सि�मिलत मानन् चािहए, िजन मामल� म� पुिलस �ारा िववेचना के उपरा�त आरोप प� �ेिषत िकया जा चुका है। िजन मामल� म� अि�तम िरपोट� �ेिषत की जा चुकी है या �यायालय �ारा िवचारण के उपरा�त अिभयु� को दोषमु� िकया जा चुका है, उसे आपरािधक िववरण म� सि�मिलत न िकया जाये।

¶82

10. यहाँ यह भी �प� िकया जाता है िक यिद िकसी जनपद म� इस अिधिनयम म� िदये गये �ािवधान� के स�ब�ध म� िकसी अधीन�थ अिधकारी �ारा अपने कत पालन की उपे�ा करने अथवा अपने अिधकार का ��पयोग का कोई मामला �काश म� आता है तो स�बि�धत थाना �भारी एवं दोषी पाये गये अिधकारी के अलावा जनपद के विर� पुिलस अधी�क / पुिलस अधी�क �भारी भी उ�रदायी माने जाय�गे।"

¶83

14. It is also to be noted that vide Circular dated 24.10.2003, Director General of Police, U.P. has issued the directions similar to the Government Order dated 2.1.2004 as noted above.

¶84

Relevant paragraph 2 of Circular dated 24.10.2003 is reproduced as under :-

¶85

"2. िकसी भी िगरोह के िव�� काय�वाही करने के िलए उसके िव�� केवल उ�ह� मामल� को आपरािधक सूची म� सि�मिलत मानना चािहए िजन मामल� म� पुिलस �ारा िववेचना के उपरा�त आरोप-प� �ेिषत िकया जा चुका है, िजन मामल� म� अि�तम िरपोट� �ेिषत की जा चुकी है या �यायालय �ारा िवचाराण के उपरा�त अिभयु� को दोषमु� िकया जा चुका है, उसे आपरािधक िववरण म� सि�मिलत न िकया जाये।"

¶86

15. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that the gang chart dated 9.10.2020, copy of which is annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition was prepared on the wrong information with respect to the filing of the chargesheets in the case crime numbers mentioned therein

¶87

16. The impugned F.I.R. on the basis of the aforesaid gang chart as such was lodged on the basis of the wrong information furnished in the gang chart as noted above.

¶88

17. As such the writ petition in the given facts and circumstances is hereby allowed.

¶89

The impugned F.I.R. No.0430 of 2020 dated 13.10.2020, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda as well as gang chart dated 9.10.2020, copy of which are annexed as Annexure Nos.1 and 2 to the writ petition are hereby quashed.

¶90

18. However, since it is submitted by learned A.G.A. that now chargesheets in Case Crime No.312 of 2019 and Case Crime No.406 of 2020 against petitioners have already been

¶91

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶92

¶93

prepared and filed before the court concerned meaning thereby that in all the criminal cases as mentioned in the gang chart, chargesheets against both the petitioners have been filed as such we hereby give liberty to the competent authority to take a fresh decision in this regard and do the needful."

¶94

14. In the aforesaid judgment, the relevant provisions of law has been considered and reference of Government Order dated 02.01.2004 has been given in paragraphs 11 to 14 which would also applicable in the present case.

¶95

15. Therefore, in view of what has been considered above, we find that the impugned F.I.R. No.451 of 20222, under Section 2(b)(i) and 3 of Gangsters Act, Police Station-Pasgawan, District-Lakhimpur is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the aforesaid F.I.R. is hereby quashed.

¶96

16. However, since it has been submitted by learned A.G.A. that now the charge-sheet has been filed in the case crime number in question against the present petitioner, as such, we hereby giving liberty to the competent authority to take a fresh decision in this regard and do the needful."

¶97

Learned AGA opposed the instant application. However, they could not dispute the fact that in three cases i.e. Case Crime No. 98 of 2020, Case crime No. 114 of 2020 and Case Crime No. 164 of 2019 the charge sheet(s) were filed in the Court(s) concerned on 07.12.2020, 12.11.2020 and 06.03.2021, respectively, and Gang chart was prepared on 04.11.2020 and was approved on 06.11.2020.

¶98

8. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record.

¶99

Taking note of aforesaid as also the judgment(s), referred above, this Court is of the view that the proceedings are liable to be quashed. It is for the following reason(s):-

¶100

(i) In Case Crime No. 91 of 2019 the judgment of acquittal has been passed on 18.11.2025.

¶101

(ii) The Gang chart was prepared and forwarded on 04.11.2020 and thereafter again forwarded on 05.11.2020 and subsequently was approved by the District Magistrate on 06.11.2020. It is to be noted that the gang chart was prepared before filing of charge sheet(s) in Case Crime No. 98 of 2020, Case crime No. 114 of 2020 and Case Crime No. 164 of 2019, which were filed on 07.12.2020, 12.11.2020 and 06.03.2021, respectively.

¶102

Accordingly, the application is allowed. The proceedings of Session

¶103

A482 No. 3056 of 2023

¶104

¶105

Case No. 255 of 2021 (State vs. Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others) pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Rape and POCSO Act)-II, Balrampur and also charge sheet arising out of Case Crime No. 156 of 2020 under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster's Act, P.S.-Sadullah Nagar, Balrampur, including summoning order dated 24.11.2021 against the applicants are hereby quashed.

¶106

Since charge sheet(s) have been filed in all the above mentioned cases, this Court provides liberty to concerned Officers to take fresh decision in the matter, if required.

¶107

November 18, 2025 Vinay/-

¶108

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶109

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arif Anwar Hashmi and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohit Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. and 4 Others

Ram Prakash Gupta Vs C.B.I. , a.C.B., Lucknow

Mahesh Singh and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko and Another

Smt. Satyawati vs Sri Sandeep Kumar Engineer in Chief Irrigation Deptt. (Mechanical) Sinchai Bhawan Lko.

Maya Ram vs Arun Kumar Pandey, Sub Inspector P.S. Hardi Distt. Bahraich U.P.

Radha Devi and 2 Others Vs Dinesh Kumar