Dismissed¶13

Mukesh Babu Tripathi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Dec 2025A482/22443/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 BNSS quashing application dismissed as withdrawn; Mukesh Babu Tripathi v. State of U.P.; challenge to S.138 Negotiable Instrument Act proceedings Case No.3290 of 2019 and summoning order dated 15.04.2022 (JM/ACJ JD Court No.9, Agra, P.S. Tajganj); liberty to file bail application; 15 days no coercive action; expeditious bail disposal directed; Vikram D. Chauhan, J.; December 2, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail; protection from coercive action for 15 days; direction to the court concerned to decide any bail application expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments. ¶13

Mukesh Babu Tripathi vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22443 of 2024

¶3

Versus Mukesh Babu Tripathi	....	.Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Go Tripathi	pal,	Devashish
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 76

¶4

HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The present application has been filed by applicant for quashing the further proceeding of Case No.3290 of 2019 under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Tajganj, District Agra and summoning order dated 15.04.2022 passed by Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.9, Agra, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate/ Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.9, Agra.

¶7

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 528 BNSS with liberty to file bail application before the court below.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to

¶10

A482 No. 22443 of 2024

¶11

¶12

enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party.

¶13

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶14

December 2, 2025

¶15

D. Tamang

¶16

(Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukesh Babu Tripathi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Babu Tripathi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nagen Sarkar vs Managing Director, U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. and 4 Others

Shailesh Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Shakir vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Shavnam Nihar Partner M/S Ahad Medicose vs State of U.P. and Another

Zahid Hasan vs State of U.P. and Another

Aman Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another