Smt.Sarita Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of 2017 Section 482 application as infructuous by efflux of time; applicant absent even in revised call; interim order vacated; liberty to seek restoration; Allahabad High Court; Prashant Kumar, J.; 2025:AHC:88777; Sarita Sharma v. State of U.P.
What did the court decide?
The application is dismissed as having become infructuous by efflux of time, the Court observing that either the parties have lost interest or the matter has become infructuous, with the applicant absent even in revised call. ¶¶10