Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed as infructuous; no one appeared to press the petition, no interim order was operating, and the court found the case had lost relevance with passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1701 of 2019
Amit Prabhakar And Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ii Lko And Others
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Gaurav Shukla
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition.
Shri Arpit Kumar, learned A.G.A. is present.
From perusal of the record that in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating.
It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
November 15, 2025
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Prabhakar And Others
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ii Lko And Others
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
