Application under Section 482 CrPC by Ramu and another against the State of U.P.; the High Court took the complainant's vakalatnama on record, granted time for counter affidavit, permitted rejoinder thereafter, and listed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1302 of 2025
Applicant :- Ramu And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Verma,Harish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Shri Abhishek Srivastava, learned Advocate on behalf of the complainant is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the complainant prays for and is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit.
Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List on 27.03.2025.
Order Date :- 12.2.2025 R.C.
Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ramu And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
