A Section 482 application was listed for hearing but no one appeared for the applicants even on revised call. The High Court rejected the application for non-prosecution and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:718
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12615 of 2023
Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
2. Application is accordingly rejected for non-prosecution.
(Brij Raj Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 6.1.2025 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhir Kumar And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Another
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
